On the day of the opening of the National Museum of the American Indian in
Washington, D.C., I attended a press conference of the National Indian
Gaming Association.
From my seat at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., I could see
media people, tribal officials and staff I recognized from the National
Indian Gaming Association. There were others whom I thought probably were
members of the association's staff.
It was then that I realized my knowledge of Indian tribes needed
reorienting.
The influence of Indian gaming probably is the reason I am
seeing a new kind of Indian. For example, the tribal chairman from the
Mashantucket Pequot, whom I saw at the press conference, looked black
rather than Native American. His aide did, too.
I realize that for the past 20 or so years, I haven't gotten out much past
Canada and the states surrounding North Dakota. The Indian people in this
area usually are Dakota, Lakota, Nakota, Chippewa or from the Three
Affiliated Tribes - Arikara, Mandan and Hidatsa. And I absolutely know
there are Native Americans who are mixed blood; I have blond grandchildren,
for example. But these two Pequot men certainly turned my head when they
walked into the room. Since that press conference, I have paid more
attention to Indian gaming issues.
Have these newly recognized tribes arisen solely for federal programs and
the gaming business?
During the press conference, the current chairman of the National Indian
Gaming Association, Ernest Stevens Jr., applauded the success of the gaming
tribes. Indian gaming has grown to a $16.7 billion industry and created
500,000 jobs nationwide, he said. Tribes have at their fingertips one of
the greatest economic development tools in 200 years.
This success is a godsend for many tribes.
Six speakers from successful casinos were chosen to talk about the
prosperity of their gaming endeavors. Thomas, the Mashantucket Pequot
chairman, was one of the speakers. The Pequot run the very successful
Foxwoods Resort Casino in Connecticut.
My question is, who are the Mashantucket Pequot? Were they really a tribe?
I was unable to reach chairman Thomas by phone. Arthur Henic, the tribe's
public relations person, answered my questions this way: The tribe was
federally recognized in October 1983 during President Reagan's
administration. Members who have lineage to the 1900 and 1910 census are
considered part of the tribe, he said.
In the past few weeks, I've read a book titled, "Without Reservation: How a controversial Indian tribe rose to power and built the world's largest casino," by Jeff Benedict. It's about the Mashantucket Pequot.
It reads like a good novel. Benedict has an "inside their heads" narrative
that I was a little put off by. But I was shocked, too, at his recounting
of the bloody history of what happened to many Indians on the East Coast.
It made me think how lucky some of the Plains tribes are. We weren't faced
with as much outside influence.
Here is what Benedict's book says. After seeing the stark poverty and abuse
in Indian country in South Dakota, a lawyer named Tom Tureen left that
state and took a job with Indian Legal Services in Calais, Maine. There he
worked with more than 1,500 Passamaquoddy, "who wallowed in extreme poverty
on a vast wilderness reservation," as the book describes.
Tureen wanted to help the Passamaquoddy become federally recognized so
they'd be eligible for federal programs. In his research, he found that
other coastal tribes might be eligible for federal recognition, too, thanks
to the 1790 Nonintercourse Act.
Tureen's people contacted all tribes that seemed to fit the category of a
tribe. In his search for other tribes, Elizabeth George of the Mashantucket
Pequot was identified. She lived on 214 acres with a wooden sign that read,
"Western Pequot Indian Reservation, established 1667."
She defended her land in Ledyard, Conn., for years from outsiders and with
a shotgun.
On first glance and because George lived on land identified by the state as
a reservation, it was assumed she represented a tribe.
Enter Richard "Skip" Hayward, her grandson. At the time, neither Hayward
nor any of George's other relatives had an interest in the reservation, and
all of them identified themselves as white, according to Benedict's book.
But when they were approached about the lawsuit for land and federal
programs, Hayward, who was elected chief, pulled together his family and
anyone else who could tie themselves to the Mashantucket Pequot, the book
says.
Over the next 30 years, the reservation grew to 2,000 acres and 600 people
claiming to be Pequot. Their Foxwoods casino grosses more than $1 billion a
year.
There is a murmuring in Indian country about tribes who, it seems, have
jumped on the bandwagon because federal benefits and, more recently, casino
wealth.
So it twisted my gut a little when I saw Thomas boasting about their Indian
gaming successes. In some parts of Indian country, a word used to describe
these tribes is "opportunists," not Indian people trying to regain a
culture and language. That word crosses my mind on occasion, too. And I
still have questions about the federal government and Congress' role in
granting federal recognition.
FURTHER READING:
Without Reservation: How a controversial Indian tribe rose to power and built the world's largest casino by Jeff Benedict
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Cookie Preferences
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
Name
Description
Duration
Cookie Preferences
This cookie is used to store the user's cookie consent preferences.
30 days
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
Name
Description
Duration
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
You can find more information in our Cookie Policy and .



